Practice parameter - Evaluation of the child with microcephaly - an evidence-based review
Systematic review published in Neurology in September 2009. Recommendations: Neuroimaging may be considered useful in identifying structural causes in the evaluation of the child with microcephaly (Level C). Targeted and specific genetic testing may be considered in the evaluation of the child with microcephaly who has clinical or imaging abnormalities that suggest a specific diagnosis or who shows no evidence of an acquired or environmental etiology (Level C). Screening for coexistent conditions such as cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and sensory deficits may also be considered (Level C). Further study is needed regarding the yield of diagnostic testing in children with microcephaly. (Source: Neurological Conditions Specialist Library)
Related posts:
- Practice Parameter: Evaluation of the child with microcephaly (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society
- Practice Parameter: Pharmacologic treatment of spasticity in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society
- Practice parameter: pharmacologic treatment of spasticity in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (an evidence-based review): report of the quality standards subcommittee of the american academy of neurology and the practice committee of the child neurology society
- Evidence on physiotherapeutic interventions for adults with cerebral palsy is sparse - A systematic review
- Genetics and Biology of Microcephaly and Lissencephaly
Categories: Michigan Birth Injury News | | Permalink | Trackback |
Print This Post
|
Email This Post
